Green v. Arkansas Department of Community Correction
ORDER granting 14 MOTION for Protective Order filed by Arkansas Department of Community Correction; directing the parties to submit for the Court's consideration an agreed protective order within 20 days of the entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 2/7/12. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF
Plaintiff Christal Green brings this action against defendant Arkansas Department of
Community Correction alleging employment discrimination. Defendant has filed a motion
[doc.#14] for a protective order stating that plaintiff has requested personnel material for third
parties employed by defendant and that while defendant will make the information available to
plaintiff, it should be subject to a protective order. Plaintiff does not object to a protective order
per se but states that defendant made no attempt to resolve the matter without court intervention.
Having considered the matter, the Court grant’s defendant’s motion for a protective
order. As there is not a proposed protective order for the Court’s consideration, the Court directs
that within twenty (20) days of the date of entry of this Order, the parties submit for the Court’s
consideration an agreed protective order. If the parties are unable to agree on a protective order,
they may each submit, again within twenty (20) days of the date of entry of this Order, their own
proposed protective order after which the Court will make a determination of the wording of the
protective order to be entered.1
IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of February 2012.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Protective orders of the type appropriate to this situation are routine and the Court does not
expect any difficulties of the parties in agreeing to a protective order, especially as plaintiff indicates the
parties will be able to work out the matter between themselves.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?