Jones v. Robertson et al

Filing 56

ORDER denying pltf's 49 Motion to Compel; granting pltf's 55 Motion for Extension of Time up to and including 9/12/12 to respond to defts' 50 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 8/13/12. (vjt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION WALTER PHILLIP JONES ADC # 610198 V. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 5:11CV00211 KGB/BD VERNON R. ROBERTSON, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Mr. Jones has filed a motion to compel, seeking an order requiring Defendant Robertson to more fully respond to discovery requests. (Docket entry #49) Mr. Robertson has responded to the motion by stating that the information Mr. Jones requested is irrelevant and outside the scope of this lawsuit. After reviewing Mr. Robertson’s responses, it is clear that the information Mr. Jones seeks is not sufficiently related to any issue in this case. For that reason, the motion (#49) is DENIED. Mr. Jones also has moved for additional time to respond to the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (#55) That motion (#55) is GRANTED. His response is now due on or before September 12, 2012. IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of August, 2012. ___________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?