Conway v. Corizon Inc et al

Filing 11

ORDER directing the Clerk to prepare summons for defts Corizon, Inc., Nance and Lebel. The U.S. Marshal is directed to serve a copy of the Amended Complaint and summons on these defts in care of Humphries & Lewis Law Firm, P.O. Box 20670, White Hall, AR 71612, without prepayment of fees therefor. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 11/22/11. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION BYRON CONWAY, ADC #113285 v. PLAINTIFF 5:11-cv-00234-SWW-JTK CORIZON, INC., et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER By Order dated October 3, 2011 (Doc. No. 4), this Court granted Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. However, finding Plaintiff’s Complaint too vague and conclusory to enable the Court to determine whether it is frivolous, fails to state a claim, or states a legitimate claim, the Court directed him to submit an Amended Complaint within thirty days. The Court also cautioned Plaintiff that an Amended Complaint would render the Original Complaint without legal effect, and would take the place of his Original Complaint. Plaintiff has now submitted an Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 8). Having reviewed the Amended Complaint, it now appears to the Court that service is appropriate for Defendants Corizon, Inc., Nance and Lebel. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that service is appropriate for the Defendants Corizon, Inc., Nance, and Lebel. The Clerk of the Court shall prepare summons for the Defendants and the United States Marshal is hereby directed to serve a copy of the Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 8) and summons on these Defendants in care of Humphries and Lewis Law Firm, P.O. Box 20670, White Hall, AR 71612, without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefore. 1 IT IS SO ORDERED this 22nd day of November, 2011. __________________________________ JEROME T. KEARNEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?