Conway v. Corizon Inc et al
Filing
11
ORDER directing the Clerk to prepare summons for defts Corizon, Inc., Nance and Lebel. The U.S. Marshal is directed to serve a copy of the Amended Complaint and summons on these defts in care of Humphries & Lewis Law Firm, P.O. Box 20670, White Hall, AR 71612, without prepayment of fees therefor. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 11/22/11. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
BYRON CONWAY,
ADC #113285
v.
PLAINTIFF
5:11-cv-00234-SWW-JTK
CORIZON, INC., et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
By Order dated October 3, 2011 (Doc. No. 4), this Court granted Plaintiff’s Motion to
Proceed in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. However, finding
Plaintiff’s Complaint too vague and conclusory to enable the Court to determine whether it is
frivolous, fails to state a claim, or states a legitimate claim, the Court directed him to submit an
Amended Complaint within thirty days. The Court also cautioned Plaintiff that an Amended
Complaint would render the Original Complaint without legal effect, and would take the place of
his Original Complaint. Plaintiff has now submitted an Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 8). Having
reviewed the Amended Complaint, it now appears to the Court that service is appropriate for
Defendants Corizon, Inc., Nance and Lebel. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that service is appropriate for the Defendants Corizon,
Inc., Nance, and Lebel. The Clerk of the Court shall prepare summons for the Defendants and the
United States Marshal is hereby directed to serve a copy of the Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 8)
and summons on these Defendants in care of Humphries and Lewis Law Firm, P.O. Box 20670,
White Hall, AR 71612, without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefore.
1
IT IS SO ORDERED this 22nd day of November, 2011.
__________________________________
JEROME T. KEARNEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?