Scott v. Buchman et al

Filing 63

ORDER denying 53 Motion for Discovery and to 54 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 4/11/12. (kpr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
BENJAMIN DEWAYNE SCOTT, SR.,
ADC #90681
v.

PLAINTIFF

5:11-cv-00241-DPM-JTK

J. BUCHMAN, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

Plaintiff’s Motions for Discovery and to Compel Discovery (Doc. Nos. 53, 54) are DENIED
without prejudice. Plaintiff failed to comply with FED.R.CIV.P. 37 and Local Rule 7.2, by not
certifying that he made a prior good fath attempt to confer with Defendants in order to resolve the
discovery issues. In addition, Plaintiff does not identify the specific responses to which he objects,
and does not indicate the reasons for the information sought.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of April, 2012.

______________________________________
JEROME T. KEARNEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE