Polite v. Child Development Inc

Filing 37

ORDER granting 32 MOTION for Protective Order filed by Teresa Polite; defts shall submit to the Court a copy of the Protective Order attached to its response as directed; 31 MOTION to Amend Complaint filed by Teresa Polite is denied. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 3/23/12. (vjt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION TERESA POLITE, Plaintiff VS. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, INC., Defendant * * * * * * * * * * NO: 5:11CV00252 SWW ORDER Before the Court is plaintiff’s motion for a protective order and defendant’s response. The Court grants the motion for protective order. The Court directs defendant to submit to the Court a copy of the protective order attached to its response in Word Perfect or Word format. Also before the Court is plaintiff’s motion to amend to which defendant responded. The motion is denied. The Court finds the amendments proposed are futile in that they fail to state a claim of race discrimination or harassment and are beyond the scope of plaintiff’s EEOC charge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion for protective order [docket entry 32] is granted. The motion to amend [docket entry 31] is denied. DATED this 23rd day of March, 2012. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?