Polite v. Child Development Inc

Filing 37

ORDER granting 32 MOTION for Protective Order filed by Teresa Polite; defts shall submit to the Court a copy of the Protective Order attached to its response as directed; 31 MOTION to Amend Complaint filed by Teresa Polite is denied. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 3/23/12. (vjt)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION

TERESA POLITE,
Plaintiff
VS.
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, INC.,
Defendant

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*

NO: 5:11CV00252 SWW

ORDER
Before the Court is plaintiff’s motion for a protective order and defendant’s response. The
Court grants the motion for protective order. The Court directs defendant to submit to the Court a copy
of the protective order attached to its response in Word Perfect or Word format.
Also before the Court is plaintiff’s motion to amend to which defendant responded. The motion
is denied. The Court finds the amendments proposed are futile in that they fail to state a claim of race
discrimination or harassment and are beyond the scope of plaintiff’s EEOC charge.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion for protective order [docket entry 32] is
granted. The motion to amend [docket entry 31] is denied.
DATED this 23rd day of March, 2012.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1