Washington v. Hobbs

Filing 12

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8 and dismissing petition with prejudice. Certificate of appealability denied. 10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply granted. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/14/12. (kpr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

PINE BLUFF DIVISION

ANDRE WASHINGTON

ADC # 108623

v.

PETITIONER

No.5:11-cv-304-DPM

RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas
Department of Correction

RESPONDENT

ORDER
Magistrate Judge Deere entered her recommended disposition in this
case on 4 April 2012. Document No.8. Washington moved to extend his time
to object, Document No. 10, and then filed his objections in early May 2012.

Document No. 11. The Court grants Washington's motion, Document No. 10,
and has considered Washington's objections in its de novo review. FED. R. CIV.

P. 72(b)(3).
Looking at the entire record, the Court finds that Judge Deere's
recommended disposition is legally and factually sound. The Court therefore
adopts the recommended disposition in its entirety, Document No.8, and
dismisses Washington's petition with prejudice. Document No.2. The Court
declines to issue a certificate of appealability; Washington has not made a

substantial showing that his constitu tional rights have been denied. 28 U .s.C.
§ 22S3(c).

Motion to extend time to object, Document No. 10, granted.
Recommended disposition, Document No.8, adopted. Petition, Document No.
2, dismissed with prejudice. Certificate of appealability denied.

So Ordered.

i::7'

D.P. Marshall jr.
United States District Judge

-2­