Washington v. Hobbs

Filing 12

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8 and dismissing petition with prejudice. Certificate of appealability denied. 10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply granted. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/14/12. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION ANDRE WASHINGTON ADC # 108623 v. PETITIONER No.5:11-cv-304-DPM RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction RESPONDENT ORDER Magistrate Judge Deere entered her recommended disposition in this case on 4 April 2012. Document No.8. Washington moved to extend his time to object, Document No. 10, and then filed his objections in early May 2012. Document No. 11. The Court grants Washington's motion, Document No. 10, and has considered Washington's objections in its de novo review. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). Looking at the entire record, the Court finds that Judge Deere's recommended disposition is legally and factually sound. The Court therefore adopts the recommended disposition in its entirety, Document No.8, and dismisses Washington's petition with prejudice. Document No.2. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability; Washington has not made a substantial showing that his constitu tional rights have been denied. 28 U .s.C. § 22S3(c). Motion to extend time to object, Document No. 10, granted. Recommended disposition, Document No.8, adopted. Petition, Document No. 2, dismissed with prejudice. Certificate of appealability denied. So Ordered. i::7' D.P. Marshall jr. United States District Judge -2­

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?