Marks v. Hobbs

Filing 13

ORDER adopting 11 Proposed Findings and Recommendations as this Court's findings. Mr. Marks's petition is dismissed with prejudice. Judgment will be entered accordingly. The Court will not issue a certificate of appealability because Mr. Marks has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 6/2/2014. (ks)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION BERNARD MARKS ADC #115216 v. PETITIONER Case No. 5:11-cv-00306-KGB RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction RESPONDENT ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations from Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 11) and the objections filed by petitioner Bernard Marks (Dkt. No. 12). After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and are hereby, approved and adopted as this Court’s findings. Mr. Marks’s petition is dismissed with prejudice. Judgment will be entered accordingly. The Court will not issue a certificate of appealability because Mr. Marks has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2). SO ORDERED this the 2nd day of June, 2014. ______________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?