Jackson v. Washington

Filing 27

ORDER ADOPTING 25 the proposed findings and recommended disposition; dismissing 2 Plaintiff's Complaint without prejudice for failure to respond to the court's order, failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5 (c)(2), and for failure to prosecute. It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal would be frivolous and would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 12/4/2012. (kdr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
PERRY LEE JACKSON, JR.
ADC #90614
v.

PLAINTIFF

CASE NO. 5:12CV00005 BSM/HDY

MARKEDA WASHINGTON, Correctional Officer,
Cummins Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction

DEFENDANT

ORDER
The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States
Magistrate Judge H. David Young [Doc. No. 25] have been reviewed. No objections have
been filed. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the
record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be,
and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.

Plaintiff’s complaint [Doc. No. 2] is dismissed without prejudice for failure to

respond to the court’s order, failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), and for failure to
prosecute.
2.

It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) than an in forma pauperis

appeal would be frivolous and would not be taken in good faith.
An appropriate judgment shall accompany this order.
Dated this 4th day of December 2012.
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE