Pryor-Kendrick v. Hobbs
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 30 ; granting 33 Motion for Copies; denying 10 Motion for Writ of Mandamus; denying 13 Motion to Transfer Case; denying 23 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 26 Motion for Order; denying 28 M otion for Order; denying 29 Motion to Amend/Correct, as modified. The Clerk is directed to scan and file all of document nos. 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 & 28 electronically, and update or supplement the corresponding docket entries, by 10/5/12. The Clerk should mail all the originals back to Pryor-Kendrick by that date, too. The Court declines to enter a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/11/12. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
THERESA C. W. PRYOR-KENDRICK
ADC # 708204
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney has recommended, Document No.
30, that Pryor-Kendrick's petition for a writ of habeas corpus be denied with
prejudice and that her motions to amend be denied. Pryor-Kendrick has filed
an objection, a statement of facts, and a letter. Document Nos. 31, 32 & 34.
On de novo review,
R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3), the Court adopts Judge
Kearney's thorough and well-reasoned opinion as its own with one
amplification: the citation to Bressman on page 10 should reflect that it is to
Judge Heaney's opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.
Pryor-Kendrick has elaborated her allegations about the 2009 parolerevocation hearing and earlier criminal convictions. But she has not produced
any authority-or even argument-that her challenges to that hearing or
those convictions are within the limitations period for a habeas action. 28
U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1). And her timely claims are not cognizable.
Second proposed findings and recommendations, Document No. 30,
adopted in full as amplified. Motions to amend, Document Nos. 23 & 29,
denied. Other motions, Document Nos. 10, 13 & 26, are denied as moot.
Pryor-Kendrick's motion for copies, Document No. 33, is granted as modified.
The Clerk is directed to scan and file all of Document Nos. 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 &
28 electronically, and update or supplement the corresponding docket entries,
by 5 October 2012.
The Clerk should mail all the originals back to
Pryor-Kendrick by that date too.
The Court declines to enter a certificate of appealability as to this Order
or the related Judgment because Pryor-Kendrick has not made a substantial
showing that she was denied any constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) &
HABEAS CORPUS R.
D.P. Marshall r.
United States District Judge
11 September 2012
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?