Willis v. Hobbs

Filing 8

ORDER informing Petitioner of his opportunity to reply within 30 days to Respondent's arguments in his 7 Response to Habeas Petition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 4/2/12. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION CARL EDWARD WILLIS ADC #134185 V. PETITIONER Case No. 5:12CV00040 BSM-JTK RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction RESPONDENT ORDER Petitioner is hereby informed of his opportunity to reply within thirty (30) days to Respondent’s arguments in his Response (DE #7) that the petition should be dismissed because it is untimely under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1), and Petitioner has not shown he is entitled to statutory tolling of the limitations period under § 2244(d)(2). Petitioner may also reply to Respondent’s argument that the petition should be dismissed as procedurally defaulted as to claims two, three, four, five, six, eight, and nine because Petitioner failed to raise them on direct appeal to the Arkansas Court of Appeals. Petitioner may reply to any other argument in the Response. SO ORDERED this 2nd day of April, 2012. ___________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?