Willis v. Hobbs
ORDER informing Petitioner of his opportunity to reply within 30 days to Respondent's arguments in his 7 Response to Habeas Petition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 4/2/12. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
CARL EDWARD WILLIS
Case No. 5:12CV00040 BSM-JTK
RAY HOBBS, Director,
Arkansas Department of Correction
Petitioner is hereby informed of his opportunity to reply within thirty (30) days
to Respondent’s arguments in his Response (DE #7) that the petition should be
dismissed because it is untimely under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1), and Petitioner has not
shown he is entitled to statutory tolling of the limitations period under § 2244(d)(2).
Petitioner may also reply to Respondent’s argument that the petition should be dismissed
as procedurally defaulted as to claims two, three, four, five, six, eight, and nine because
Petitioner failed to raise them on direct appeal to the Arkansas Court of Appeals.
Petitioner may reply to any other argument in the Response.
SO ORDERED this 2nd day of April, 2012.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?