Johnson v. Hughes et al
Filing
93
JUDGMENT: Consistent with the 92 Order entered this day, Johnson's claims against defendants Marybeth Floyd and Jennifer Horn are dismissed with prejudice. Johnson's claims against defendants Joseph Hughes, Corizon, Inc., and Crystal Sims are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/5/2012. (dmn)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
CARLEST MATTHEWS JOHNSON
ADC #142752
PLAINTIFF
V.
CASE NO. 5:12CV00042 BSM
JOSEPH HUGHES et al
DEFENDANTS
JUDGMENT
Consistent with the order entered this day, Johnson’s claims against defendants
Marybeth Floyd and Jennifer Horn are dismissed with prejudice. Johnson’s claims against
defendants Joseph Hughes, Corizon Inc., and Crystal Sims are dismissed without prejudice.
It is further certified that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment
dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 5th day of October 2012.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
