Johnson v. Hughes et al

Filing 93

JUDGMENT: Consistent with the 92 Order entered this day, Johnson's claims against defendants Marybeth Floyd and Jennifer Horn are dismissed with prejudice. Johnson's claims against defendants Joseph Hughes, Corizon, Inc., and Crystal Sims are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/5/2012. (dmn)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION CARLEST MATTHEWS JOHNSON ADC #142752 PLAINTIFF V. CASE NO. 5:12CV00042 BSM JOSEPH HUGHES et al DEFENDANTS JUDGMENT Consistent with the order entered this day, Johnson’s claims against defendants Marybeth Floyd and Jennifer Horn are dismissed with prejudice. Johnson’s claims against defendants Joseph Hughes, Corizon Inc., and Crystal Sims are dismissed without prejudice. It is further certified that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 5th day of October 2012. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?