Willis v. Hobbs

Filing 23

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 and dismissing the case with prejudice. A Certificate of Appealability is denied. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 9/10/12. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION CARL EDWARD WILLIS ADC #134185 V. PETITIONER NO. 5:12-cv-00045 KGB-JTR RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction RESPONDENT ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. The Court granted petitioner's motion requesting an extension oftime to respond to the recommended disposition on July 02, 2012 (Dkt. No. 21). After a review ofthose proposed findings and recommendations, and the objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts the proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT this Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 (Dkt. No. 2) is DENIED, and that this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. DATED this~ day of September, 2012. KRISTINE G. BAKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?