St Christopher v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Filing 43

ORDER granting 41 Motion to Clarify. Defendant shall have up to and including 03/21/2014 to respond. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 02/04/2014. (rhm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION LORNE ST. CHRISTOPHER v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 5:12-cv-00058-KGB UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY DEFENDANT ORDER Before the Court is defendant’s motion for clarification of time to respond to plaintiff’s motion in limine (Dkt. No. 41). Defendant requests clarification from the Court that defendant’s response to plaintiff’s motion in limine is due August 11, 2014, pursuant to the Court’s second amended final scheduling Order (Dkt. No. 38). Alternatively, defendant requests that the Court grant defendant an extension until June 28, 2014, to respond. In support of defendant’s request for extension, defense counsel explains that he is currently preparing for a two week out-of-town trial that is scheduled to begin on February 18, 2014. Plaintiff objects to defendant’s request for a 150 day extension to respond but does not object to a reasonable extension of time to respond in order to accommodate defense counsel’s February trial. For good cause shown, defendant’s request for an extension of time to respond to plaintiff’s motion in limine is granted. Defendant shall have up to and including March 21, 2014, to respond. SO ORDERED this the 4th day of February, 2014. ________________________________ KRISTINE G. BAKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?