Norton v. Hobbs

Filing 15

ORDER ADOPTING 14 the proposed findings and recommended disposition; granting 8 Respondent's motion to dismiss and dismissing 1 Stanley Turner Norton's petition for a writ of habeas corpus without prejudice so that he may seek authorization from the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A), to file a successive habeas petition. A certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 11/20/2012. (kdr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION STANLEY TURNER NORTON ADC #99798 v. PETITIONER CASE NO. 5:12CV00067 BSM RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction RESPONDENT ORDER The proposed findings and recommended disposition [Doc. No. 14] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray have been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record, it is found that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 8] of respondent Ray Hobbs is granted, and Stanley Turner Norton’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus [Doc. No. 1] is dismissed without prejudice so that he may seek authorization from the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A), to file a successive habeas petition. 2. A certificate of appealability is denied pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Dated this 20th day of November 2012. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?