Hicks et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Filing 26

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. All claims of defts Mr. Livingston and Mr. Johnson are dismissed without prejudice. All claims of defts. Mr. Hicks, Mr. Raborn, Mr. Dunbar, and Mr. Kimmons are hereby dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 7/9/13. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION OSCAR H. HICKS, JR., HUBERT H. RABORN, RICHMOND H. DUNBAR, ROY L. KIMMONS, BILLY F. LIVINGSTON, and THOMAS H. JOHNSON v. PLAINTIFFS Case No. 5:12-cv-00095-KGB UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY DEFENDANTS ORDER OF DISMISSAL Before the Court are two stipulations of dismissal. First, plaintiffs Billy F. Livingston and Thomas H. Johnson, together with defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company (“Union Pacific”), have filed a joint stipulation of dismissal without prejudice (Dkt. No. 24). Accordingly, all claims of Mr. Livingston and Mr. Johnson are hereby dismissed without prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs. Second, plaintiffs Oscar H. Hicks, Jr., Hubert H. Raborn, Richmond H. Dunbar, and Roy L. Kimmons, together with defendant Union Pacific, have filed a joint stipulation of dismissal with prejudice (Dkt. No. 25). Accordingly, all claims of Mr. Hicks, Mr. Raborn, Mr. Dunbar, and Mr. Kimmons are hereby dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. SO ORDERED this the 9th day of July, 2013. _____________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?