Hicks et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Filing
26
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. All claims of defts Mr. Livingston and Mr. Johnson are dismissed without prejudice. All claims of defts. Mr. Hicks, Mr. Raborn, Mr. Dunbar, and Mr. Kimmons are hereby dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 7/9/13. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
OSCAR H. HICKS, JR.,
HUBERT H. RABORN,
RICHMOND H. DUNBAR,
ROY L. KIMMONS,
BILLY F. LIVINGSTON, and
THOMAS H. JOHNSON
v.
PLAINTIFFS
Case No. 5:12-cv-00095-KGB
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
DEFENDANTS
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Before the Court are two stipulations of dismissal. First, plaintiffs Billy F. Livingston
and Thomas H. Johnson, together with defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company (“Union
Pacific”), have filed a joint stipulation of dismissal without prejudice (Dkt. No. 24).
Accordingly, all claims of Mr. Livingston and Mr. Johnson are hereby dismissed without
prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs.
Second, plaintiffs Oscar H. Hicks, Jr., Hubert H. Raborn, Richmond H. Dunbar, and Roy
L. Kimmons, together with defendant Union Pacific, have filed a joint stipulation of dismissal
with prejudice (Dkt. No. 25). Accordingly, all claims of Mr. Hicks, Mr. Raborn, Mr. Dunbar,
and Mr. Kimmons are hereby dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs.
The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
SO ORDERED this the 9th day of July, 2013.
_____________________________
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?