Richardson v. Pevey et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5 and dismissing the complaint with prejudice. The dismissal counts as a strike, and the Court certifies that an ifp appeal would be frivolous and not taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/6/12. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
EVERY DONELLE RICHARDSON
ADC # 139311
AMANDA PEVEY, Nurse, Varner
Unit, ADC; RAYMOND NAYLOR,
Disciplinary Hearing Administrator,
ADC; and MINNIE L. DRAYER,
Disciplinary Hearing Officer, ADC
United States Magistrate Judge Deere recently entered proposed
findings and recommendations in this case. Document No.5. Judge Deere
concluded that the Court should dismiss Richardson's claims with prejudice
because, even assuming all the allegations in Richardson's complaint are true,
he cannot prevail on his due-process claim. Richardson did not object to
Judge Deere's recommended disposition. Having reviewed the proposal for
clear errors of fact on the face of the record,
R. CIV. P. 72(b) (advisory
committee notes to 1983 addition), and for legal error, the Court adopts Judge
Deere's proposed findings and recommendations as its own. 28 U.S.C. §
The Court therefore dismisses Richardson's complaint, Document No.2,
with prejudice. The dismissal counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
And the Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal would be frivolous
and not taken in good faith.
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?