Brazell v. Washington et al
Filing
63
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 62 granting defts' 46 54 Motions for Summary Judgment and dismissing the complaint without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/6/12. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
MICHAEL BRAZELL, JR.
ADC # 500711
v.
PLAINTIFF
No.5:12-cv-100-DPM-JJV
M. WASHINGTON; MOSELEY; TATE;
DENISE CHANCE; HARRIS; LUCRECIA
BRADLEY; G. LAY; M. WARNER;
POSEY; and REED
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
No one has objected to Magistrate Judge Volpe's proposed findings and
recommendations. Document No. 62. The Court has therefore reviewed them
for clear errors of fact on the face of the record, FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (advisory
committee notes to 1983 addition), and for legal error. Finding neither, the
Court adopts Judge Volpe's proposed findings and recommendations in their
entirety. Defendants' motions for summary judgment, Document Nos. 46 &54,
granted. Complaint, Document No.2, dismissed without prejudice because
Brazell failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. All other pending
motions denied as moot.
So Ordered.
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?