Brazell v. Washington et al

Filing 63

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 62 granting defts' 46 54 Motions for Summary Judgment and dismissing the complaint without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/6/12. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION MICHAEL BRAZELL, JR. ADC # 500711 v. PLAINTIFF No.5:12-cv-100-DPM-JJV M. WASHINGTON; MOSELEY; TATE; DENISE CHANCE; HARRIS; LUCRECIA BRADLEY; G. LAY; M. WARNER; POSEY; and REED DEFENDANTS ORDER No one has objected to Magistrate Judge Volpe's proposed findings and recommendations. Document No. 62. The Court has therefore reviewed them for clear errors of fact on the face of the record, FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (advisory committee notes to 1983 addition), and for legal error. Finding neither, the Court adopts Judge Volpe's proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety. Defendants' motions for summary judgment, Document Nos. 46 &54, granted. Complaint, Document No.2, dismissed without prejudice because Brazell failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. All other pending motions denied as moot. So Ordered. D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?