Robinson v. Davis et al
ORDER ADOPTING 98 Partial Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, pltf's 92 motion to amend his complaint is DENIED; pltf's motions for reconsideration 86 96 and 102 are DENIED. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 8/21/12. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
LATARRIS KEITH ROBINSON
NO. 5:12CV00109 JLH/BD
CORDERRO R. DAVIS, et al.
The Partial Recommended Disposition (“Recommendation”) from Magistrate Judge Beth
Deere has been received, and no objections to the Recommendation have been filed.
Recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved in all respects. Accordingly, Latarris Keith
Robinson’s motion to amend his complaint is DENIED. Document #92.
The Court has also reviewed Robinson’s motions for reconsideration. His motions for
reconsideration state that he did not receive the previous Partial Recommended Dispositions. He
does not, however, state any meritorious objection to the previous Partial Recommended
Dispositions that the Court has adopted, even if the record is reviewed de novo. Therefore, the
motions for reconsideration are DENIED. Documents #86, #96, #102.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of August, 2012.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?