Robinson v. Davis et al

Filing 24

ORDER granting 23 Robinson's Motion for Extension of Time to File Objections and Statement of Necessity to the Partial Recommended Disposition; Objections to R&R due 5/14/12. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 4/18/12. (vjt)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
LATARRIS KEITH ROBINSON,
ADC #108971
v.

PLAINTIFF

NO. 5:12CV00109 JLH/BD

CORDERRO R. DAVIS, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

Latarris Keith Robinson has moved for additional time to file objections to the partial
recommended disposition that Judge Deere issued on March 29, 2012, recommending that
Robinson’s claims against Defendants Banks and May be dismissed. In the motion, he also requests
an explanation as to what needs to be included in his “statement of necessity.” If Robinson seeks to
object to any portion of Judge Deere’s recommendation, he should file an “objection” explaining why
he believes that his claims against Defendants Banks and May should not be dismissed. He should
include any factual allegations which support his claims against Defendants Banks and May in his
objections. If Robinson believes that a hearing needs to be held to determine whether he should be
permitted to proceed on his claims against Defendants Banks and May, he should file a “statement
of necessity” specifically explaining why a hearing is necessary.
Robinson’s motion is GRANTED. Document #23. Robinson’s time for filing objections and
a statement of necessity is extended up to and including May 14, 2012.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of April, 2012.

___________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE