Aaron v. Anthony et al
ORDER directing the Clerk to prepare summons for deft Sgt. C. Anthony. The U.S. Marshal is directed to serve a copy of the Amended Complaint and summons on this deft in care of the ADC Compliance Division, P.O. Box 20550, Pine Bluff, AR 71612-0550, without prepayment of fees therefor. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 5/7/12. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
KAMEON VANKEIS AARON,
C. ANTHONY, et al.
By Order dated April 12, 2012 (Doc. No. 7), this Court granted Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed
in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. However, finding Plaintiff’s
Complaint too vague and conclusory to enable the Court to determine whether it is frivolous, fails
to state a claim, or states a legitimate claim, the Court directed him to submit an Amended
Complaint within thirty days.
Plaintiff submitted an Amended Complaint against Defendants
Anthony, Cashion, and Harris (Doc. No. 10), and a Motion to Dismiss the remaining Defendants,
which was granted by Order dated April 27, 2012 (Doc. No. 11). Having reviewed the Amended
Complaint, it now appears to the Court that service is appropriate with respect to Plaintiff’s
allegation of retaliation against Defendant Anthony. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that service is appropriate for the Defendant Sgt. C.
Anthony. The Clerk of the Court shall prepare summons for the Defendant and the United States
Marshal is hereby directed to serve a copy of the Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 10) and summons
on this Defendant in care of the Arkansas Board of Correction and Community Punishment
Compliance Division, P.O. Box 20550, Pine Bluff, AR 71612-0550, without prepayment of fees and
costs or security therefore.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of May, 2012.
JEROME T. KEARNEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?