Bargo v. Kelly et al
Filing
93
ORDER ADOPTING 90 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition of Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff's 82 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. The Court Certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 11/4/2013. (mcz)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
JEROME ALLEN BARGO,
ADC #75423
V.
PLAINTIFF
5:12CV00127 JMM/JTR
LARRY MAY, Assistant Director,
Arkansas Department of Correction, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have been
filed. After careful review, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and
Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their
entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiff’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 82) is DENIED.
2.
The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in
forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
Dated this 4th day of November, 2013.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?