Roberts v. Austin et al

Filing 44

ORDER ADOPTING 34 Partial Report and Recommendations; therefore, defts' 20 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED; pltf's deliberate-indifference claims against defts Austin and Bland are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 7/31/13. (vjt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION BRUNSON ROBERTS ADC #127841 V. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 5:12CV00166 SWW/BD M. AUSTIN and ESTELLA MURRAY/BLAND DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received the Partial Recommended Disposition (“Recommendation”) filed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. After careful review of the Recommendation, the timely objections, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court’s findings in all respects. The Defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment (docket entry #20) is GRANTED. Mr. Roberts’s deliberate-indifference claims against Defendants Austin and Bland are DISMISSED, with prejudice.1 IT IS SO ORDERED this 31st day of July, 2013. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Defendants may file a separate motion for leave to file a dispositive motion on the remaining claim of retaliation.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?