Roberts v. Herrington et al

Filing 22

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 19 Partial Report and Recommendations. The John Does are dismissed from this action without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/17/12. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION BRUNSON ROBERTS ADC # 127841 v. PLAINTIFF No. 5:12-cv-188-DPM-HDY JOHN HERRINGTON; BRIAN LEVENGOOD; RAY HOBBS; RAYMOND NAYLOR; G. LAY; M. WARNER; V. ROBERTSON; J. HOLSTEAD; TINA GIBSON; MERLIN FITZPATRICK; and JOHN DOES DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Young's Proposed Findings and Recommendations, Document No. 19, Roberts's objections, Document No. 20, and a response from Defendants Herrington, Fitzpatrick, Gibson, and Levengood, Document No. 21. After carefully considering the responses and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court adopts the Proposed Findings and Recommendations as its own. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). The John Does are dismissed from this action without prejudice. So Ordered. D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?