Hicks v. Dub Brassell Detention Center
ORDER adopting the proposed findings and recommended disposition; dismissing Plaintiff's complaint with prejudice. It is CERTIFIED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order and accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 7/31/2012. (hph)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
CASE NO. 5:12CV00199 BSM/JJV
W.C. DUB BRASSELL DETENTION CENTER
The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States
Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe have been reviewed. No objections were filed. After carefully
considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that
the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and
adopted in their entirety in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
Plaintiff Earline Hicks’s complaint [Doc. No. 2] be DISMISSED with
prejudice for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted.
Dismissal of Hicks’s complaint should constitute a “strike” within the meaning
of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
It is CERTIFIED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this order and accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith.
Dated this 31st day of July 2012.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?