Moore v. Hill et al

Filing 53

ORDER withdrawing the reference to Magistrate Judge H. David Young. 49 Motion for an Immediate Hearing is granted. 44 Motion in Limine granted in part and denied in part; 46 Motion in Limine granted in part and denied in part; and 50 Motion f or Expenses granted on the video and usual pre-trial expenses, and denied without prejudice on medical expenses. Moore should renew his motion with specifics if he wants some relief on medical-related expenses. Parties' pre-trial disclosure sheets and trial briefs due 22 July 2014. Moore should notify Defendants of other witnesses he plans to call by 22 July 2014, with a final list to Chambers by 1 August 2014. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/15/2014. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION KEITH MOORE, ADC #133412 v. PLAINTIFF No. 5:12-cv-206-DPM JAMES HILL, Sergeant, ADC; LANTZ GOFORTH, Sergeant, ADC; RICHARD LEE, Sergeant, ADC; and CHARLES POOLE, Corporal, ADC DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court withdraws the reference to Magistrate Judge H. David Young. Motion for an immediate hearing, NQ 49, granted. For the reasons stated on the record at yesterday's hearing, Moore's motion in limine, NQ 44, granted in part and denied in part with caveats. Defendants' motion in limine, NQ 46, granted in part and denied in part with caveats. Motion for expenses, NQ 50, granted on the video and usual pre-trial expenses, and denied without prejudice on medical expenses. We didn't get to cover this last issue at the hearing. Moore should renew his motion with specifics if he wants some relief on medical-related expenses. Parties' pre-trial disclosure sheets and trial briefs due 22 July 2014. Moore should notify Defendants of other witnesses he plans to call by 22 July 2014, with a final list to Chambers by 1 August 2014. So Ordered. D.P. Marshall)r. t/ United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?