Bryant v. Hobbs et al

Filing 103

ORDER denying 89 Motion to Deem Admitted. The Court will not receive any additional motions or responses on this issue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 2/28/13. (kpr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
DALE BRYANT,
ADC #99472
v.

PLAINTIFF

5:12CV00226-SWW-JTK

RAY HOBBS, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

Plaintiff’s Motion to Declare that Requests for Admission from Defendants Stell and Clyde
be deemed admitted (Doc. No. 89) is DENIED. The Court finds no evidence of intentional
misleading by Defense Counsel, and no evidence that Plaintiff did not timely receive the responses
to the requests. The Court will not receive any additional motions or responses on this issue;
Plaintiff is reminded of his responsibility, pursuant to FED.R.CIV.P 37, to confer with opposing
counsel prior to filing objections to discovery responses. In addition, Plaintiff is reminded of his
responsibilities under FED.R.CIV.P. 11(b).1
IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of February, 2013.

______________________________________
JEROME T. KEARNEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

“By presenting to the court a pleading, written motion, or other paper...an attorney or
unrepresented party certifies that to the best of the person’s knowledge, information, and
belief...(1) it is not being presented for any improper purpose....”