Thomas v. Hobbs et al

Filing 5

JUDGMENT: Consistent with the 4 Order of Dismissal that was entered on this day, it is Considered, Ordered, and Adjudged that this case is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, for failing to state a claim. Further, the Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 7/18/2012. (dmn) (Docket text modified on 7/18/2012 to correct typographical error.) (dmn).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
DEQUAN THOMAS,
ADC #144490
v.

PLAINTIFF

No. 5:12CV00256 JLH/JTR

RAY HOBBS, Director,
Arkansas Department of Correction; et al.

DEFENDANTS

JUDGMENT
Consistent with the Order of Dismissal that was entered on this day, it is CONSIDERED,
ORDERED, and ADJUDGED that this case is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, for failing
to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Further, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith.
DATED this 18th day of July, 2012.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE