Bledsoe v. Hobbs

Filing 21

ORDER ADOPTING 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; and dismissing 1 petition, with prejudice. A certificate of appealability will not be issued because Bledsoe has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 1/7/2013. (kdr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
ARTHUR BLEDSOE, JR.,
ADC # 072514
v.

PETITIONER

CASE NO. 5:12CV00288 BSM

RAY HOBBS, Director,
Arkansas Department of Correction

RESPONDENT
ORDER

The proposed findings and recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate
Judge Jerome T. Kearney, and the objections filed by the petitioner Arthur Bledose, Jr., have
been reviewed. After careful consideration and a de novo review of the record, it is
concluded that the recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its
entirety. Accordingly, the petition [Doc. No. 1] is dismissed with prejudice. In accordance
with Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, a certificate of appealability will
not be issued because Bledsoe has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a
constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of January 2014.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE