Elmore v. Kelly et al
ORDER adopting 5 Partial Recommended Disposition and dismissing without prejudice claims against Defendants Watt, Burchfield,Jones, Malone, Price, Anderson, Correctional Medical Services, and Pharmacorr Pharmacy. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/18/2012. (mcz)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
JEFFREY CHARLES ELMORE
WENDY KELLY, et al.
The Court has considered Magistrate Judge Beth Deere's Partial
Recommended Disposition, Document No. 5. No one has objected. Having
reviewed the proposal for clear errors of fact on the face of the record, FED. R.
CIV. P. 72(b) (Advisory Committee notes on the 1983 addition), and for legal
error, the Court adopts the proposal as its own. Elmore may proceed on his
claim that Defendants Kelly, McBride, Snyder, McLean, Hubbard, Carswell,
Iko, Cantrell, Gibson, Banks, Meinzer, and Baum failed to provide adequate
medical treatment for his scabies and thus acted with deliberate indifference
to his medical needs. Elmore's claims against Defendants Watt, Burchfield,
Jones, Malone, Price, Anderson, Correctional Medical Services, and
Pharmacorr Pharmacy are dismissed without prejudice. Elmore's claims that
the Defendants failed to adequately treat his migraines, acid reflux, chest
pain, and foot problems are dismissed without prejudice too.
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?