Elmore v. Kelly et al

Filing 6

ORDER adopting 5 Partial Recommended Disposition and dismissing without prejudice claims against Defendants Watt, Burchfield,Jones, Malone, Price, Anderson, Correctional Medical Services, and Pharmacorr Pharmacy. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/18/2012. (mcz)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION PLAINTIFF JEFFREY CHARLES ELMORE v. No. 5:12-cv-325-DPM-BD WENDY KELLY, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has considered Magistrate Judge Beth Deere's Partial Recommended Disposition, Document No. 5. No one has objected. Having reviewed the proposal for clear errors of fact on the face of the record, FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (Advisory Committee notes on the 1983 addition), and for legal error, the Court adopts the proposal as its own. Elmore may proceed on his claim that Defendants Kelly, McBride, Snyder, McLean, Hubbard, Carswell, Iko, Cantrell, Gibson, Banks, Meinzer, and Baum failed to provide adequate medical treatment for his scabies and thus acted with deliberate indifference to his medical needs. Elmore's claims against Defendants Watt, Burchfield, Jones, Malone, Price, Anderson, Correctional Medical Services, and Pharmacorr Pharmacy are dismissed without prejudice. Elmore's claims that the Defendants failed to adequately treat his migraines, acid reflux, chest pain, and foot problems are dismissed without prejudice too. So Ordered. D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?