Hill v. Wright et al

Filing 15

ORDER ADOPTING 10 Partial Report and Recommendations dismissing the claims for damages against Wright and Taylor in their official capacities, with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 10/3/12. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION PLAINTIFF STEVEN EARL HILL, JR. ADC # 139009 v. No. 5:12-cv-329-DPM-JJV MATTHEW PAUL WRIGHT., JR., Lt., Varner Super Max, ADC; and SCOTT A. TAYLOR, Lt., Varner Super Max, ADC DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has considered Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe's Proposed Findings and Recommendations, Document No. 10. No one has objected. Having reviewed the proposal for clear errors of fact on the face of the record, FED. R. Crv. P. 72(b)(Advisory Committee notes to 1983 addition), and for legal error, the Court agrees that the Eleventh Amendment bars Hill's claims for damages against Wright and Taylor in their official capacities. Those claims are dismissed with prejudice. So Ordered. ~Md_~-fi. D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge 3 October 2012

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?