Alexander v. Hobbs
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 9 granting 5 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 8 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/5/12. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
CLARENCE SIDNEY ALEXANDER,
RAY HOBBS, Director,
Arkansas Department of Correction
The Court has considered Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe's Proposed
Findings and Recommended Disposition, Document No. 9, and Alexander's
objections, Document No. 10. After de novo review, FED. R. CIV. PRO. 72(b), the
Court adopts Judge Volpe's well-crafted proposal as its decision. Hobbs's
motion to dismiss, Document No.5, is granted. All other pending motions are
denied as moot. Alexander's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Document
No.2, is dismissed. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability
because Alexander did not make a substantial showing of the denial of a
constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(l)-(2).
D.P. Marshall Jr.
U.S. District Court Judge
5 December 2012
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?