Oldham v. Hobbs et al
Filing
24
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 23 and dismissing complaint without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee and failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5 and failure to respond to the Court's December 14, 2012, Order. All pending motions are denied as moot. 10 16 19 . Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 4/1/13. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
STEVE OLDHAM
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 5:12-cv-00348 KGB
RAY HOBBS et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young (Dkt. No. 23). No objections have been
filed.
After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and
Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as
this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1. Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to pay the filing
fee, failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), and failure to respond to the
Court’s December 14, 2012, Order.
2. All pending motions are denied as moot.
3. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the Order and
Judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
SO ORDERED this the 1st day of April, 2013.
________________________________
KRISTINE G. BAKER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?