Brown v. Cosen et al

Filing 27

ORDER ADOPTING 26 Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge, granting Defendants' 18 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice. The court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 7/25/2014. (mcz)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION PATRICK BROWN v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 5:12-cv-00374-KGB-JJV COSEN, Officer; et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe (Dkt. No. 26). No objections have been filed, and the time for filing objections has passed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. It is, therefore, ordered that: 1. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted (Doc. No. 18) ; 2. Plaintiff Patrick Brown’s claims are dismissed with prejudice; and 3. The Court certifies that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. SO ORDERED this 25th day of July, 2014. _____________________________________ KRISTINE G. BAKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?