Robinson v. Mine Safety Appliances Company et al

Filing 344

ORDER denying 337 Motion to Stay the Summary Judgment briefing. Robinson's responses due by 20 March 2014. Any replies due by 31 March 2014. The disclosure issues should be explored at Dr. Ridgeway's upcoming deposition. Defendants may then file a separate motion for sanctions if they choose to do so. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/18/2014. (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
PLAINTIFF

HERSHEL LEE ROBINSON

v.

No. 5:12-cv-383-DPM

MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO.;
PANGBORN CORP.; PRECISION
PACKAGING INC.; E.D. BULLARD CO.;
and CLEMCO INDUSTRIES INC.

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
Defendants' motion to stay the summary judgment briefing, NQ 33 7, is
denied. Rqbinson' s responses due by 20 March 2014. Any replies due by 31
March 2014. The disclosure issues should be explored at Dr. Ridgeway's
upcoming deposition.

Defendants may then file a separate motion for

sanctions if they choose to do so. But this older case needs to keep moving
forward.
So Ordered.

D.P. Marshall Jr. tt
United States District Judge