Little v. Hobbs

Filing 11

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8 with a supplement. All Little's claims are either not cognizable on habeas, inexcusably procedurally defaulted, or were reasonably adjudicated by the Arkansas Supreme Court. Little's embedded re quests for more time and more documents are denied. The 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Ronald Dean Little is dismissed with prejudice. A certificate of appealability will not issue. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/2/13. (kpr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
RONALD DEAN LITTLE
ADC#l09926

v.

PETITIONER

No. 5:12-cv-385-DPM-JJV

RAY HOBBS,
Director, ADC

RESPONDENT
ORDER

Little has objected, NQ 9 & NQ 10, to Magistrate Judge Volpe's Proposed
Findings and Recommendations, NQ 8. On de novo review, the Court adopts
the proposal with a supplement. FED. R. Crv. P. 72(b)(3). All Little's claims
are either not cognizable on habeas, inexcusably procedurally defaulted, or
were reasonably adjudicated by the Arkansas Supreme Court.

Little's

embedded requests for more time and more documents are denied; the
existing record demonstrates that this Court cannot grant relief in the
circumstances presented. Little's petition for a writ of habeas corpus, NQ 2, is
dismissed with prejudice. A certificate of appealability will not issue.
So Ordered.

Rf?1~Ad.dl'#·
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
2July 2013