Smith v. Johnson et al
Filing
27
JUDGMENT re 26 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations. Smith's claims against Johnson are dismissed with prejudice; his claims against Dobbs are dismissed without prejudice. The failure-to-protect and conditions-of-confinement claims against Boultinghouse and Minor are dismissed with prejudice. An ifp appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/20/13. (kpr)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
JAMES EDWARD SMITH
ADC # 103093
v.
PLAINTIFF
No. 5:12-cv-409-DPM
SAMMY D. JOHNSON, CO-I, Pine Bluff Unit,
ADC, and T. DOBBS, Varner Unit, ADC
DEFENDANTS
JUDGMENT
Smith's complaint is dismissed.
His claims against Johnson are
dismissed with prejudice; his claims against Dobbs are dismissed without
prejudice.
The failure-to-protect and conditions-of-confinement claims
against Boultinghouse and Minor are dismissed without prejudice; his falsedisciplinary and due-process claims are dismissed with prejudice. NQ 7. An
in forma pauperis appeal from this Judgment and the related Orders would not
be taken in good faith.
D.P. Marshall Jr. I'
United States District Judge
;:{0
p-e JDI]
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
