Marshall v. Drew Central School District et al

Filing 60

JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the 59 Opinion and Order entered in this matter on this date, it is Considered, Ordered, and Adjudged that Brian Marshall's Fourteenth Amendment due process claims against Drew Central School District, Rene Nowles, Mike Pennington, Curley Jackson, Brandon Satterlee, Miyoshi Smith, Wayne Fawcett, Steven M. Noble, and Theda Fran Colbert are dismissed with prejudice and that Brian Marshall's state claims pursuant to the Arkansas Civil Rights Act of 1993, interference with parental rights under the Arkansas Constitution, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and false imprisonment are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 6/3/2014. (ks)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
BRIAN MARSHALL,
Plaintiff,
vs.

DREW CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT;
RENE NOWLES, MIKE PENNINGTON,
CURLEY JACKSON, BRANDON
SATTERLEE, and MIYOSHI SMITH,
individually and in their official capacities
as current and former members of the
Drew Central School Board; WAYNE
FAWCETT, individually and in his official
capacity as former Superintendent of
Drew Central School District; STEVEN M.
NOBLE, individually and in his official
capacity as former Principal of Drew
Central High School; THEDA FRAN
COLBERT, individually and in her official
capacity as Bus Driver of Drew Central
School District and in her official capacity
as Secretary of Drew Central High School;
and JOHN DOES A-Z and JANE
DOES A-Z,
Defendants.

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*

No. 5:12-cv-00428-SWW

JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the Opinion and Order entered in this matter on this date, it is
Considered, Ordered, and Adjudged that Brian Marshall’s Fourteenth Amendment due
process claims against Drew Central School District, Rene Nowles, Mike Pennington,
Curley Jackson, Brandon Satterlee, Miyoshi Smith, Wayne Fawcett, Steven M. Noble,
and Theda Fran Colbert are dismissed with prejudice and that Brian Marshall’s state

claims pursuant to the Arkansas Civil Rights Act of 1993, interference with parental
rights under the Arkansas Constitution, intentional infliction of emotional distress (tort of
outrage), and false imprisonment are dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 3rd day of June 2014.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2-