Naum v. Bolden et al

Filing 5

ORDER adopting 4 Report and Recommendations as the Court's own. Naum's complaint 2 is dismissed without prejudice. An informa pauperis appeal of this Order and Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/30/2013. (dmn)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION NUUH AMIR NAUM v. PLAINTIFF No. 5:12-cv-433-DPM-HDY BOLDEN, Chief, WC Brassell Detention Center; TYLER, Major, WC Brassell Detention Center; and ADAMA, Captain, WC Brassell Detention Center DEFENDANTS ORDER No one has objected to Magistrate Judge H. David Young's proposed findings and recommendations, Document No. 4. Having reviewed the proposal for clear errors of fact on the face of the record, FED. R. Crv. P. 72(b) (Advisory Committee notes to 1983 Addition), and for legal error, the Court adopts the proposal as its own. Naum has not paid a filing fee or filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. He was warned his failure to do so would result in the case's dismissal. Document No. 3. His complaint, Document No.2, is therefore dismissed without prejudice. An in forma pauperis appeal of this Order and Judgment would not be taken in good faith. So Ordered. D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge 3o ~ d.o!j

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?