Naum v. Bolden et al

Filing 5

ORDER adopting 4 Report and Recommendations as the Court's own. Naum's complaint 2 is dismissed without prejudice. An informa pauperis appeal of this Order and Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/30/2013. (dmn)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
NUUH AMIR NAUM
v.

PLAINTIFF
No. 5:12-cv-433-DPM-HDY

BOLDEN, Chief, WC Brassell Detention Center;
TYLER, Major, WC Brassell Detention Center; and
ADAMA, Captain, WC Brassell Detention Center

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
No one has objected to Magistrate Judge H. David Young's proposed
findings and recommendations, Document No. 4.

Having reviewed the

proposal for clear errors of fact on the face of the record, FED. R. Crv. P. 72(b)
(Advisory Committee notes to 1983 Addition), and for legal error, the Court
adopts the proposal as its own. Naum has not paid a filing fee or filed an
application to proceed in forma pauperis. He was warned his failure to do so
would result in the case's dismissal.

Document No. 3. His complaint,

Document No.2, is therefore dismissed without prejudice. An in forma pauperis
appeal of this Order and Judgment would not be taken in good faith.
So Ordered.

D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge

3o ~ d.o!j