Barnes v. Hobbs et al

Filing 5

ORDER ADOPTING 3 the proposed findings and recommended disposition; denying 1 Plaintiff's application to proceed without prepayment of fees and affidavit; directing plaintiff to submit the statutory filing fee of $350.00 to the Clerk, n oting the above case style and number within 10 days of the date on this Order, together with a motion to reopen case, should he wish to continue this case; and dismissing 2 plaintiff's complaint without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 12/13/2012. (kdr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION GUY CLAYTON BARNES ADC #93209 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 5:12CV00442 BSM RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and plaintiff’s objections have been reviewed. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s application to proceed without prepayment of fees and affidavit [Doc. No. 1] is denied. 2. Should plaintiff wish to continue this case, he must submit the statutory filing fee of $350.00 to the Clerk, noting the above case style and number within ten (10) days of the date of this Order, together with a motion to reopen the case. Upon receipt of the motion and full payment, the case will be reopened. 3. Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice. 1 An appropriate judgment shall accompany this order DATED this 13th day of December 2012. _______________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?