Emerson v. Hobbs et al

Filing 12

ORDER adopting 9 Partial Report and Recommendations and denying 2 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 2/7/13. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION TINA EMERSON ADC #710724 V. PLAINTIFF NO: 5:12CV00449 SWW/HDY RAY HOBBS et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young, and the objections filed. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT Plaintiff’s motion for an injunction (docket entry #2) is DENIED. DATED this 7th day of February, 2013. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Plaintiff’s statements in her objections [doc.#11] to the recommended denial of her motion for injunction (due to legal mail delays) that she “do[es] not think I can continue” and is “exhausted” appears to relate, at least in part, to her statement that she is “bogged down with litigation up to my ears” and that she does not think she can continue without an attorney or assistance.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?