Emerson v. Hobbs et al
ORDER adopting 9 Partial Report and Recommendations and denying 2 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 2/7/13. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
NO: 5:12CV00449 SWW/HDY
RAY HOBBS et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young, and the objections filed. After
carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the
Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and
hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.1
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT Plaintiff’s motion for an injunction (docket entry
#2) is DENIED.
DATED this 7th day of February, 2013.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff’s statements in her objections [doc.#11] to the recommended denial of her
motion for injunction (due to legal mail delays) that she “do[es] not think I can continue” and is
“exhausted” appears to relate, at least in part, to her statement that she is “bogged down with
litigation up to my ears” and that she does not think she can continue without an attorney or
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?