Jones v. Hobbs et al
Filing
134
ORDER directing the clerk to prepare three new subpoenas duces tecum for the specific medical records listed in Plantiff's Motion 127 in which the recipients will have 14 days to produce the records to the Court. The U. S. Marshal is directed to serve the subpoenas duces tecum without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 04/01/2014. (kcs)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
DAVID JONES
ADC #94099
V.
PLAINTIFF
5:12CV00456 SWW/JTR
MEGAN BOND, Varner Unit Infirmary,
Arkansas Department of Correction, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
On March 26, 2014, the Court entered an Order directing the Clerk to issue
subpoenas duces tecum to St. Vincent's Hospital, UAMS, and Forest Park Medical
Center. Doc. 132. The issued subpoenas incorrectly stated that those three entities
were required to produce all of Plaintiff's medical records for treatment he "received
in 2006 and 2008 for his back, neck and hand." Doc. 133.
The Court wishes to clarify that only the specific documents listed in Plaintiff's
Motion (Doc. 127) need to be produced. Additionally, Plaintiff's date of birth (XXXX-XX73) must appear on the subpoenas so that his medical records can be properly
located. Accordingly, new subpoenas will be issued.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1.
The Clerk is directed to prepare three new subpoenas duces tecum for the
specific medical records listed in Plaintiff's Motion (Doc. 127). The recipients will
have fourteen days from service to produce the specified medical records to the Court,
which will then distribute any produced medical records to the parties.
2.
The U.S. Marshal is directed to serve the subpoenas duces tecum without
prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor.
Dated this 1st day of April, 2014.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?