Williams v. Hobbs et al
ORDER ADOPTING 65 the proposed findings and recommendations; granting 54 defendants' motion for summary judgment; dismissing plaintiff Michael Williams's complaint against defendants Frances Johnson and Corey Haynie, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies; and dismissing Williams's complaint against the remaining defendants, with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 2/28/2014. (kdr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
CASE NO. 5:12CV00457 BSM
RAY HOBBS, et al.
The proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge
Jerome T. Kearney, and the objections filed by the plaintiff, have been reviewed. After
careful consideration, and a de novo review of the record, it is found that the
recommendations should be, and hereby are, adopted in their entirety. Accordingly,
defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 54] is granted. Plaintiff Michael
Williams’s complaint against defendants Frances Johnson and Corey Haynie is dismissed
without prejudice, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Williams’s complaint
against the remaining defendants is dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of February 2014.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?