Holmes et al v. Hall et al
ORDER adopting 5 the proposed findings and recommended disposition; dismissing 2 Plaintiffs' complaint, without prejudice, for failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 4/25/2013. (kdr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
ADC # 152514,
and SHAY HUMPHREY
CASE NO. 5:13CV00007 BSM
DAVID HALL, et al.
The proposed findings and recommended disposition [Doc. No. 5] submitted by
United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young have been reviewed. No objections have
been filed. After careful consideration and a de novo review of the record, it is found that
the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and
adopted in their entirety.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
Plaintiffs’ complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with
Local Rule 5.5(c)(2).
It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), that an in forma
pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith.
Dated this 25th day of April 2013.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?