Holmes et al v. Hall et al

Filing 7

ORDER adopting 5 the proposed findings and recommended disposition; dismissing 2 Plaintiffs' complaint, without prejudice, for failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 4/25/2013. (kdr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
MANDRICK HOLMES
ADC # 152514,
and SHAY HUMPHREY
v.

PLAINTIFFS

CASE NO. 5:13CV00007 BSM

DAVID HALL, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The proposed findings and recommended disposition [Doc. No. 5] submitted by
United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young have been reviewed. No objections have
been filed. After careful consideration and a de novo review of the record, it is found that
the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and
adopted in their entirety.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1.

Plaintiffs’ complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with

Local Rule 5.5(c)(2).
2.

It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), that an in forma

pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith.
Dated this 25th day of April 2013.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE