Grissom v. White et al
ORDER that the remainder of 60 Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel filed by Wesley Elisha Grissom is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 01/15/2014. (kcs)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
WESLEY ELISHA GRISSOM,
LATRICIA WHITE, Kitchen Supervisor,
Delta Regional Unit, et al.
On December 24, 2013, the Court issued an Order directing the ADC
Defendants to file a sealed Supplemental Response to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel
that: “(1) contains any grievances – that were found to have merit – alleging that
Defendant White used excessive force against a prisoner from March 13, 2009 to
March 13, 2012; (2) includes any related internal investigation documents; (3)
explains the specific security concerns that prevent them from producing each of those
grievances and documents to Plaintiff; and (4) clarifies whether redaction will
alleviate those specific security concerns.” Doc. 77 at 3.
Defendants have timely filed a Supplemental Response explaining that
Defendant White has never had a meritorious grievance filed against her that alleged
she used excessive force against a prisoner from March 13, 2009 to March 13, 2012.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT the remainder of Plaintiff's Motion to
Compel (Doc. 60) is DENIED
Dated this 15th day of January, 2014.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?