Waller v. Taylor et al

Filing 13

ORDER ADOPTING 8 Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge: Plaintiff's 2 Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Waller must submit an amended complaint within 30 days from the date of this Order that states a claim upon which reli ef may be granted, or this action will be dismissed. Waller's 4 and 5 Motions for Copies are denied as moot. This action is referred to Magistrate Judge Ray for disposition or recommended disposition of all pretrial matters. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 5/17/2013. (mcz)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION KENNETH L. WALLER, ADC #103829 v. PLAINTIFF No. 5:13CV00030 JLH/JTR LORIE A. TAYLOR; and RANDY BUDNIK; Disciplinary Hearing Officers, Arkansas Department of Correction DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the proposed findings should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted as this Court’s findings. For the reasons stated by Judge Ray, the complaint filed by Kenneth L. Waller fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Waller has recommended that he be given an opportunity to amend the complaint, however, and the Court grants that request. Waller’s initial complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Waller must submit an amended complaint that states a claim upon which relief may be granted within 30 days from the entry of this Order. Failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this action with prejudice. This action is again referred to United States Magistrate Judge Ray for disposition or recommended disposition, as appropriate, of all pretrial matters. IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of May, 2013. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?