Lauderdale v. Hobbs
Filing
36
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING 32 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing 2 petition for writ of habeas corpus; and denying all pending motions as moot. The Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 02/19/2015. (rhm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
KITAKA LAUDERDALE
v.
PETITIONER
Case No. 5:13-cv-00040-KGB
RAY HOBBS, Director,
Arkansas Department of Correction
RESPONDENT
ORDER
The Court has received the Proposed Findings and Recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 32). Petitioner Kitaka Lauderdale has filed
objections to the Proposed Findings and Recommendations (Dkt. No. 33), as well as a letter that
the Court construes as supplemental objections (Dkt. No. 35). After careful review of the
Proposed Findings and Recommendations and the timely objections thereto, as well as a de novo
review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations
should be, and are hereby, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all
respects. Petitioner’s petition is hereby dismissed with prejudice and the request for relief is
denied.
All remaining pending motions are denied as moot. The Court will not issue a certificate
of appealability because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a
constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).
Accordingly, judgment shall be entered dismissing with prejudice this case.
SO ORDERED this the 19th day of February, 2015.
_______________________________
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?