Gray v. Lay et al
ORDER: If the Court of Appeals grants IFP status, this Court will, of course, calculate and collect the fee down the line. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/29/2014. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
RUFUS L. GRAY
GAYLON LAY, Warden, Cummins Unit,
ADC and ESTELLA MURRAY/BLAND, Nurse,
Cummins Unit, ADC
The Court of Appeals remanded for this Court to determine Gray's in
forma pauperis status. NQ 71. Gray proceeded IFP here. NQ 1. But he did not
move to proceed IFP on appeal. Moreover, this Court certified in its earlier
Order that an IFP appeal would not be taken in good faith. NQ 66; 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(a)(3). The Court confirms that ruling. If the Court of Appeals grants
IFP status, this Court will, of course, calculate and collect the fee down the
D.P. Marsftall Jr. /
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?