Gray v. Lay et al

Filing 73

ORDER: If the Court of Appeals grants IFP status, this Court will, of course, calculate and collect the fee down the line. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/29/2014. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION RUFUS L. GRAY ADC #141375 v. PLAINTIFF No. 5:13-cv-42-DPM GAYLON LAY, Warden, Cummins Unit, ADC and ESTELLA MURRAY/BLAND, Nurse, Cummins Unit, ADC DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court of Appeals remanded for this Court to determine Gray's in forma pauperis status. NQ 71. Gray proceeded IFP here. NQ 1. But he did not move to proceed IFP on appeal. Moreover, this Court certified in its earlier Order that an IFP appeal would not be taken in good faith. NQ 66; 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(a)(3). The Court confirms that ruling. If the Court of Appeals grants IFP status, this Court will, of course, calculate and collect the fee down the line. So Ordered. D.P. Marsftall Jr. / United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?