Gray v. Lay et al
Filing
83
ORDER denying 82 Motion for Injunction. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/7/2017. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
PLAINTIFF
RUFUS L. GRAY
ADC #141375
v.
No. 5:13-cv-42-DPM
GAYLON LAY, Warden, Cummins Unit,
ADC and ESTELLA MURRAY/BLAND, Nurse,
Cummins Unit, ADC
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
1. Motion for injunction, NQ 82, denied. Gray believes the ADC' s
bookkeeper is unlawfully taking Gray's veteran benefits from his prison
account to make filing fee payments in this case. But this case was about
Gray's medical treatment after a spider bite in 2012; and the bookkeeper
wasn't a party. If Gray wants to litigate the benefits issue, he must exhaust
any available administrative remedies and file a new lawsuit against the
appropriate folks.
2. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in
good faith. 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(a)(3).
So Ordered.
{/
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?