Frye v. Hobbs

Filing 9

ORDER directing the Petitioner to file, on or before 5/24/2013, a Reply addressing the arguments for dismissal raised in the Response re 8 . Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 04/26/2013. (kcs) (Modified on 4/26/2013 to correct typographical error.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION

DOYLEDEWAYNEFRYE
ADC #115393

v.

PETITIONER

NO. 5:13cv00055 DPM-JTR

RAY HOBBS, Director,
Arkansas Department of Correction

RESPONDENT

ORDER

Respondent has filed a Response (docket entry #8) arguing that Petitioner's 28
U.S.C. § 2254 habeas claims should be dismissed because: (1) they are all barred by
the one-year statute of limitations; (2) his first and second claims do not state
cognizable federal habeas claims; (3) all of his claims are procedurally defaulted
because he did properly raise them in state court; and (4) alternatively, his second
claim was reasonably adjudicated by the Arkansas Supreme Court in his direct
appeal. A Reply to the Response would be helpful to resolution of this action.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT Petitioner is directed to file, on or
before May 24, 2013, a Reply addressing the arguments for dismissal raised in the

Response.
1

DATED THIS 2b~DAY OF April, 2013.

-2-