Wilmoth et al v. Hobbs et al

Filing 42

ORDER denying 34 , 37 , 38 and 39 Motions to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 1/6/2014. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION TYRONE COLLINS, ADC #111854 v. PLAINTIFF 5:13CV00060-SWW-JTK RAY HOBBS, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motions to Compel Defendants to respond to his discovery requests (Doc. Nos. 34, 37-39). In their Responses, Defendants state that Plaintiff prematurely filed his Motions prior to the due date of the discovery, and that they timely mailed the discovery responses to him on December 10, 2013 (Doc. Nos. 36, 41). In addition, Defendants state that they supplemented their responses by mailing Plaintiff a copy of his deposition transcript on December 16, 2013. (Doc. No. 41-4.) In light of Defendants’ Responses, Plaintiff’s Motions to Compel (Doc. Nos. 34, 37-39) are DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of January, 2014. ______________________________________ JEROME T. KEARNEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?