Wilmoth et al v. Hobbs et al
ORDER denying 34 , 37 , 38 and 39 Motions to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 1/6/2014. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
RAY HOBBS, et al.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motions to Compel Defendants to respond to
his discovery requests (Doc. Nos. 34, 37-39). In their Responses, Defendants state that Plaintiff
prematurely filed his Motions prior to the due date of the discovery, and that they timely mailed the
discovery responses to him on December 10, 2013 (Doc. Nos. 36, 41). In addition, Defendants state
that they supplemented their responses by mailing Plaintiff a copy of his deposition transcript on
December 16, 2013. (Doc. No. 41-4.)
In light of Defendants’ Responses, Plaintiff’s Motions to Compel (Doc. Nos. 34, 37-39) are
IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of January, 2014.
JEROME T. KEARNEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?